<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electronic Discovery Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com</link>
	<description>A weblog on e-discovery issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>To Scan or Not To Scan That is the Question</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/to-scan-or-not-to-scan-that-is-the-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/to-scan-or-not-to-scan-that-is-the-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizarri v. Sheriff of Cook County, No. 07 C 2427, 2013 U.S. Dist LEXIS 20570 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 13, 2013) &#160; Plaintiffs had sought “original intake receipts” and “any documents]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/to-scan-or-not-to-scan-that-is-the-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Want to Avoid Sanctions, Hire an E-discovery Consultant!</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/if-you-want-to-avoid-sanctions-hire-an-e-discovery-consultant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/if-you-want-to-avoid-sanctions-hire-an-e-discovery-consultant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessible v. Inaccessible Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brown v. FPI Mgmt, No. 4:11-cv-5414 YGR (KAW), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1040 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were updated almost a decade ago to]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/if-you-want-to-avoid-sanctions-hire-an-e-discovery-consultant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrieving 500 DVD&#8217;s of Archived Data with the Use of a Robotic Arm is NOT Unduly Burdensome</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/requestor-successfully-rebuts-claim-that-data-from-archiving-system-is-not-reasonably-accessible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/requestor-successfully-rebuts-claim-that-data-from-archiving-system-is-not-reasonably-accessible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wescott &#38; Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessible v. Inaccessible Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starbucks Corp. v. ADT Security Services, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120941 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 30, 2009) The controversy involved ESI stored on a Plasmon archiving system which producer argued]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/requestor-successfully-rebuts-claim-that-data-from-archiving-system-is-not-reasonably-accessible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-discovery of Sound Files, I Don&#8217;t Like the Sound of That.</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/e-discovery-of-sound-files-i-dont-like-the-sound-of-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/e-discovery-of-sound-files-i-dont-like-the-sound-of-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Borwick v. T-Mobile West Corp., Civil No. 11-cv-01683-LTB-MEH, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128968 (D. Colo. Sept. 11, 2012) &#160; Plaintiff, a telephone customer service representative, contended that she was discriminated]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/e-discovery-of-sound-files-i-dont-like-the-sound-of-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Pirate&#8217;s Right to Privacy: Don&#8217;t Download Copyrighted Information!</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/a-pirates-right-to-privacy-dont-download-copyrighted-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/a-pirates-right-to-privacy-dont-download-copyrighted-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plaintiff justifies early discovery of identities of allegedly illegal downloaders of movie &#160; Braun v. Primary Distributor Doe No. 1 and Defendant Does 2 through 69, No.: 12-cv-3690 YGR (JSC),]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/a-pirates-right-to-privacy-dont-download-copyrighted-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Failure to Institute a Litigation Hold Considered Negligence Per Se?</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/is-a-failure-to-institute-a-litigation-hold-considered-negligence-per-se/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/is-a-failure-to-institute-a-litigation-hold-considered-negligence-per-se/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chin v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Nos. 10-1904-cv(L), 10-2031-cv(XAP), 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14088 (2d Cir. July 10, 2012) The vast majority of precedents in the]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/is-a-failure-to-institute-a-litigation-hold-considered-negligence-per-se/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extortion by E-discovery: Court Grants Protective Order</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-finds-requested-esi-inaccessible-because-of-high-cost-and-that-requests-are-a-fishing-expedition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-finds-requested-esi-inaccessible-because-of-high-cost-and-that-requests-are-a-fishing-expedition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wescott &#38; Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessible v. Inaccessible Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Torres v. Governmental Development Bank of Puerto Rico, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3958 (D.P.R. Jan. 20, 2010) In an employment discrimination case, plaintiff requestors sought emails and calendar entries in]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-finds-requested-esi-inaccessible-because-of-high-cost-and-that-requests-are-a-fishing-expedition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Native for You! Judge Denies Plaintiff&#8217;s Request for Native Production</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-denies-request-for-production-in-native-format-where-requestor-failed-to-ask-for-native-initially-and-motion-to-compel-is-untimely/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-denies-request-for-production-in-native-format-where-requestor-failed-to-ask-for-native-initially-and-motion-to-compel-is-untimely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wescott &#38; Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Form of production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Secure Energy, Inc. v. Coal Synthetics, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13532 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 17, 2010) Plaintiff initially served their discovery requests on Defendnat on December 31, 2008. Plaintiff asked for &#8220;[a]ll documents]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-denies-request-for-production-in-native-format-where-requestor-failed-to-ask-for-native-initially-and-motion-to-compel-is-untimely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Suppresses E-discovery in Criminal Investigation for Government&#8217;s Bad Faith Seizure of Harddrives</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-suppresses-e-discovery-in-criminal-investigation-for-governments-bad-faith-seizure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-suppresses-e-discovery-in-criminal-investigation-for-governments-bad-faith-seizure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. v. Metter, No. 10-CR-600 (DLI), 2011U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155130 (E.D.N.Y. May 17, 2012) &#160; In this securities fraud action, the government had asserted that the defendant Metter had furthered]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/court-suppresses-e-discovery-in-criminal-investigation-for-governments-bad-faith-seizure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Denies Sanctions for Failure to Preserve Instant Messages</title>
		<link>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/adverse-inference-denied-despite-failure-to-save-instant-messages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/adverse-inference-denied-despite-failure-to-save-instant-messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larry Wescott &#38; Marc Hirschfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Duty to preserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OCE North America v. Brazeau, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25523 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 18, 2010) Plaintiff sought to close an evidentiary gap in its trade secret case against defendant by]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electronicdiscoveryblog.com/adverse-inference-denied-despite-failure-to-save-instant-messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.918 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-11 20:11:02 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->